Summary of developments regarding the communication via Pakistan to end the war on Iran: June 19, 2026.
Includes: postponing of the signing ceremony, Israeli escalation in Lebanon after the MoU was released, Israeli ceasefire violations immediately after agreement with Hezbollah.
| Highlights from yesterday | Comments | |
|
||
|
Some Republican members of Congress, particularly the hawks among them, have argued that Iran has been given too many concessions in terms of this memorandum of understanding. They point in particular to the immediate waiver of the sanctions on the export of Iranian oil as an example of the administration being too soft on Iran. The administration counters by saying that it is trying to do what is best for the US, and it’s indeed doing what is best for the US, and we heard from the vice president that not a cent of American money is going to Iran in terms of the settlement. The administration is very sensitive on this particular point, and the vice president was arguing very strongly that this deal has got safeguards in it. It relies on Iranian compliance, as he puts it, and the sanctions are linked to nuclear discussions, for example. So, Vance is intent on explaining to the American public that there are safeguards in this, and this agreement is in both nations’ interests. |
||
Top US Democratic senator slams Trump’s ‘incompetence’ |
||
Iran ‘brought the devils of the world to their knees’, says senior Iranian official |
||
Iran’s Ghalibaf says Tehran won’t tolerate US breaches of MoU |
||
Iranian president welcomes Qatar’s role in facilitating US-Iran deal |
||
Vance not going to Switzerland tonight; plans for Iran talks not finalized: White House |
The real reason why Vance is not going is that Pakistan's Prime Minister Sharif had announced yesterday, that he's not going. No reason for his decision has been given. In diplomacy, there is a custom that attendants to a ceremony must be of equal level. |
|
What China has said about the US-Iran MoU
|
||
Oil prices drop on prospect of more supply via Strait of Hormuz
|
||
Could take months for ‘normalisation’ of traffic through Strait of Hormuz |
||
Sixty days ‘not very long’ to move beyond ‘vague’ MoU |
||
Pentagon wants $80bn to cover costs of Iran war, other bills: Report |
||
How does MoU compare with Obama-era JCPOA?Trump has hailed the deal with Iran as being better than the deal brokered by former US President Barack Obama in 2015, known as the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), Trump unilaterally withdrew from that pact during his first term in 2018. But analysts warn it is too soon to determine whether the MoU will result in a comprehensive deal significantly different from the 18-page Obama-era document, which took several years to negotiate and included nuclear experts. Shahram Akbarzadeh, director of the Middle East Studies Forum at Deakin University in Melbourne, Australia, said the MoU “does not address any issue of substance”. “It simply leaves all questions regarding Iran’s nuclear programme and enrichment to be negotiated between the United States and Iran,” he said. |
||
US lawmaker says ‘thousands died for nothing’ in Trump’s ‘catastrophic’ war |
||
Switzerland says US-Iran talks will no longer take place |
||
Iran emphasizing it is ‘in control’ of HormuzThe Strait of Hormuz is the most essential form of leverage and deterrence Iran has. Iran has been quite clear – the strategic environment in the strait has changed because of the war, and it will never accept the pre-war situation there. Iran is talking about a new maritime regime. Last night, the country’s Supreme National Security Council, the highest security apparatus in the country, released a statement saying there will not be tolls in the strait for the next 60 days, as per the MoU. However, the council emphasized that any tanker wanting to pass through the strait needs to coordinate with Iran, particularly its maritime body, the Persian Gulf Strait Authority. That administration will provide clearance for passage and set the time and the lanes that vessels can use to pass. So, what we see here is Iran saying it is not going to give up on the Strait of Hormuz, and it is in control of organizing ships’ passage – both now and after 60 days.
|
||
Israel’s continuing occupation of Lebanon a ‘major hurdle’ before US-Iran talksThe timeline for implementing the commitments under the US-Iran MoU is going to be up to the parties. Essentially, what they’ve agreed upon is the immediate flow of ships through the Strait of Hormuz. That is happening. Also happening, the US has lifted all its restrictions on Iranian naval ports. There is a cessation of hostilities between the two countries, but Lebanon remains the main question. The Israeli media are reporting that four Israeli soldiers were killed in Lebanon. Israel is continuing to occupy southern Lebanese territory, and there are ongoing clashes on Lebanese soil. For the Iranians, this is a red flag because they want to ensure there is a ceasefire and respect for territorial integrity, including in Lebanon. Whether that is included will be a major hurdle before these talks begin.
|
||
Switzerland talks ‘postponed’, but ‘not off’Very careful language around the expected talks between the US and Iran are used after attendees cancelled their presence. Yesterday, the Pakistani prime minister say his visit to Switzerland is postponed. Then, the US vice president say that he still expects to go to Switzerland over the weekend but even he has said he's not going. Some sources in the mediating team say that the talks are not off, but they’ve been postponed for now. That is also what the Swiss Foreign Ministry is saying. They say that preparations for these talks to get under way in Burgenstock are still ongoing.
|
||
Lack of independent oversight over US, Iran could impede deal’s implementation
|
||
Japan-linked vessel safely passes Hormuz, says country’s PM
|
||
25 vessels cross Strait of Hormuz after US-Iran deal, data shows
|
||
Iranian officials ‘in no rush’ to start technical talksIn Iran, there is a bitter memory of the JCPOA [the Iran nuclear deal agreed to in 2015 under the administration of former US President Barack Obama that Trump withdrew from during his first term on office]. So, Iranians are engaging in diplomacy, but they have this past experience. That’s why Iran’s Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei has been extremely cautious. In a recent statement, Khamenei said that while he “held a different view” on the US-Iran MoU, he granted his permission for it after receiving assurances from Iranian officials that Iran’s rights would be safeguarded. So, you can see that his permission is conditional. That’s why Iranian officials are not in a rush to engage in the technical talks or negotiations – they know any failure would come with huge responsibility and cost.
|
||
Persian Gulf Strait Authority says vessels allowed to cross Hormuz without feesIran’s Persian Gulf Strait Authority has announced that vessels seeking to cross the Strait of Hormuz will be granted access under the terms of the Memorandum of Understanding for 60 days. In a statement on X, the authority explained that vessels will need to submit their requests to cross at least 48 hours before wanting to depart. The authority said that during the 60 days, no fees will be charged to vessels. It said the costs of security, safety, environmental services, and related Iranian insurance coverage will be borne by Iran’s government.
|
||
Can US-Iran peace ‘deal’ survive Israeli bombing of Lebanon?Neither side has given an official reason for canceling trips to begin the awaited talks, which were to be held at the Burgenstock Resort in Stansstad, near Lucerne in central Switzerland. A statement from the White House noted that “the plans for the upcoming technical talks have not been finalized,” adding that the Vance-led delegation is “prepared to depart at the first available opportunity”. However, it added, “the logistics of these negotiations have never been simple or predictable. As of now, the vice president is not departing tonight.” Iran’s semi-official Tasnim news agency reported that there was no confirmation that Iranian negotiators would travel for the talks, because they first wanted to see signs that the interim agreement, which includes Lebanon in the US-Iran ceasefire, is being implemented. |
||
Trump says Iran, not US, in position of ‘desperation’The US president has posted a message on Truth Social, appearing to respond to criticism of the interim agreement with Iran. “We didn’t meet out of desperation, Iran did,” Trump wrote. “They are FINISHED!” “We’ll play out the 60 days,” he added, in reference to the 60-day period of negotiations for a final deal outlined in the MOU. “They get no money, not ten cents!” he said.
|
Analysts in the summaries have all a common view: Iran gained what it wanted. |
|
Araghchi says Israel only interested in ‘permanent war’Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi has slammed the far-right Israeli national security minister, Itamar Ben-Gvir, who called for Lebanon to “burn” after a night of intense fighting in southern Lebanon killed four soldiers. “This is not a rant by a random genocidal lunatic. It’s a public post by the national security minister of the Israeli regime,” Araghchi wrote on X. “The genocidal death cult headquartered in Tel Aviv is a threat to all of humanity. It threatens all humans. Its only interest is permanent war,” he added.
|
||
Iranian foreign ministry says Friday meeting with US postponedIran’s foreign ministry says the meeting between the US and Iran due to be held in Switzerland on Friday has been postponed, Reuters is reporting. It said that plans were under way for the meeting to be held in the coming days and talks on the final agreement depended on the implementation of parts of the MoU.
|
||
Iran says nuclear status quo to continue until deal finalizedIran’s Foreign Ministry spokesperson Esmaeil Baghaei has denied reports that Tehran has invited the International Atomic Energy Agency to inspect its nuclear facilities. He noted that, as pointed out in the MoU with the US, Iran will maintain the current status quo of its nuclear program pending a final deal. Inspections of facilities that have been carried out until now, such as at Bushehr, will continue, he said. Inspections of other facilities, for which the IAEA’s access was suspended due to the war, will depend on the process and outcome of the negotiations, Baghaei added.
|
||